The only things I see the G5 mk II has over the Sony RX100 VI/VII, is superior noise control (RAW), the noise is much better at ISO 3200 with smaller grain and less colour noise, the lens is nice and fast and fairly good all over the frame and it has a grip. Or RX100 VIIA with a slightly short but faster lens.

I suggest studying up on technique.". Now the thing with the AF. The Sustainable Darkroom has released re-source, a new book that provides 'the most extensive collection of writing on sustainable photographic practice to date,' highlighting more environmentally-friendly ways to capture and develop analog images. Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. "Controlling DOF at 200mm"What exactly are you controlling with a 1" sensor? Therefore the Canon is the better, cheaper solution if you need a compact beside the DSLR or DSLM.

I do think you are correct, but then it completely undermines the scoring bars. It depends what you're looking for. Using DXO's NR software will produce results that would be tough to tell apart. Canon's newest compact cameras, the G5 X II and G7 X III, have a lot in common, but with some very important differences. Variances in low light ability, corner sharpness and overall operational speed DO make a difference. It uses a sony sensor.3. My wife used it to shoot a 3 day rally for medicare-for-all and returned with over 300 shots and ONE was out of focus. Sony RX100 VII vs Canon G5 X II vs Canon G7 X III, Compare leading 1" sensor compacts with our studio scene comparison tool, OM System 12-40mm F2.8 PRO II sample gallery, DPReview TV: Laowa 12-24mm F5.6 C-Dreamer Review, DPReview TV: Nikkor Z 400mm F4.5 VR Preview - Director's Cut, Best cameras for landscape photography in 2021, Best video cameras for photographers in 2022, Video: Watch this crazy contraption recover photos from a broken micro SD card, Samyang announces second-generation $799 85mm F1.4 AF lens for Sony E-mount, Video: Learn how Kodak develops and applies light-sensitive coating to its film (in the dark! If I have to shot more than 100 picture a day, it's something special. Canon's PowerShot G5 X Mark II is a high-end compact camera with a versatile lens, great controls and a modern 1"-type sensor. Controlling DOF at 200mm or tracking things that move is also kinda useful. One battery NB-13L costs more than $50. I've had RX100, RX100 III, RX10 III and several Sony mirrorless cameras, so the issue does not lie with the brand, it's not like I don't know how the menus work or have no experience with them.It's not like the camera is bad, face recognition worked way better, the camera is faster to operate with (which helps with the action, although I wished there was a memory for the last zoom position), it's sharper too.

Moving away from the product itself I'd criticize Sony for milking their customers, bringing once again two expensive models in a raw, the new one fixing the shortcoming of the older one. The 1-inch camera can put into pocket, while XT20 couldn't.

In the review it is written that the jpeg quality of the G5X II has improved over the G7X II and if I read the text at image quality it looks like the jpegs should be sharper/better than previous models.

The review clearly states that the RX100 lens outperforms the Canon as does the sensor (though I think the sensors are both okay). Proper hand-holding technique is key and it's a chuckle and half when people defend a camera with no viewfinder.

Sony's goal was to lead this segment. Even the 1.5 seconds it takes me to adjust aperture on a Sony camera is enough to change the nice expression that made me want to raise the camera up to take a shot to begin with changes into a different, boring one. Only a few lively young children presented problems, and a good hiding easily fixes that. " "So the low score is solely based on something most folks here totally don't care about?". A set of options would be displayed in rows on the screen, and you could only use the left/right sides of the four-way rocker, not the up/down to jump rows. A cheap mirrorless and good prime are better than just about every P&S I can think of. Peers is more than just a price point, the main thing is that they target the same type of consumers. Yes I read that today,unlike the EVF of the RX100. Learn from them Sony. Blackmagic Design has brought DaVinci Resolve 18 out of beta, officially launching the software.

I think APSC, MFT will survive as sonsor formats. One has to consider their needs before buying something, that's all. My personal opinion is that 24fps is a relic of the past and we shouldnt cling to it in a cargo cult fashion. LOL! Problem is that most battery packs wont work with this camera as it will only charge with the PD standard. This explains why the photos taken at the wide angle focal lenght present a quite significant distortion at their corners.

If you could not get a sharp result 1/60 at 200mm, you either have poor technique or a bad camera.

I'm not sure the details are lost on ISO or if the lens is just generally softer, but as far as noise is concerned, I'm seeing less on the Canon side. But it's much more pocketable than the Canon, if that's among your needs.I put a Small Rig on mine and now it handles like a baby DSLR with a nice wood grip. It's a serious flaw that renders the camera unusable (at least when the vanes don't fully open). Thanks DPR for the good review. Price is not related to how much it delivers but how much people are willing to spend for that product. They take different approaches with the JPEG engines, but the Canon has zero inherent advantage. You really have to chose, what you want, the size or the range. I own quite a few cameras, from the amazing Nikon D850 to the Fuji X100f. The VI and VII are pretty expensive.

It is also one more thing that can fail. Sigma CEO, Kazuto Yamaki, has stated in an interview that its much-anticipated full-frame Foveon sensor should be ready by the end of the year. From what I've read, the ZS100 and ZS200 are not so hot, either. Honestly I think both product lines are great. You can also try a contrast and color saturation of -1. Wake up Nikon and Panasonic needs a LX100III ASAP. The service was more than poor.

I'll look into that as soon as I get into the office tomorrow. The G5 X Mark II looks, in many ways, to be a near-ideal travel or family camera for enthusiast photographers that like having a dedicated camera with them at all times - does it live up to this promise? However, that camera scored lower in Metering & Autofocus than the G5X II. But the price is too heavy. The higher ISOs are better controlled, you might not need it, other do. (continued) So if you usually shoot in the sun, the RX100VII is really a "do-everything" camera. well, doesn't really matter if canon couldn't mach the AF and cut the price as a consequence or they targeted a price point and had to cut some stuff. If you look at the features of a $5000 camera and later you find some of them at a $800 camera, this would be some important information. I know it's kinda apples and oranges, but the GRIII is a niche camera that performs exceptionally well where it counts, while the G5X II seems just adequate in more areas. Thanks Rishi for the reply.

It's nearly 2020 and a external EVF is a really dated idea. His inviting green skin and magenta highlights are at the forefront of cinematic artistry . Lens performance looks to be streched to the limit in order to provide more zoom.4.

You can download samples and see for yourself. Why is that? 3) Sony listens to customers and makes adjustments quickly. Dont like the handling and controls. I figured it required USB-PD based on what I read in the review. It is also highly dependent on how people are using their camera. AF alone is not making for the f-stop difference, nor would I recommend the Canon to someone who would need that extra range. 1) The Canon and Sony sensors, relative to ISO noise handling, are the same. I find with my grandchildren you can get the knack of anticipating when they bounce and freeze for that instance before rushing off in a different direction. The rest is fairly pointless if your shots are not in focus.The tiny Sony has DSLR level AF. Its simple 101 in lighting. When traveling as a family, sometimes even m-43 is too big of a system to bring along. For me, I don't care about video. "If you could not get a sharp result 1/60 at 200mm, you either have poor technique or a bad camera. Our current protocol was designed around interchangeable lens cameras. So far no one has made a better pocket camera. Only people who want the best small camera to augment their pro gear or those seeking the absolute best travel cam will bite. I have recently picked up the camera and Im trying to get back into photography after a bit of a layoff. It's annoying that they just sell downgraded crippled cameras for lower prices and let Sony have the best overall model. Cons: "Photographers that need the best autofocus for action or family photography, as well as video shooters who may want a stronger feature set and better video quality.".

Not if you want to capture candid moments. @MrHollywoodYou get what you pay for is of necessity the Sony mantra nowadays in their struggle to contain costs and is lapped up eagerly by their well funded user group eager to buy the latest offerings but unfortunately you get what you can afford is the reality for most of us. Wasn't included in the box, by the way. Does this Canon uses Sony's the famous 1" sensor from the RX100 xx series? Thank you for the suggestions. The Nikon Z30 is the company's latest 'creator' focused mirrorless camera, a 21MP APS-C model made to be more vlogging friendly than ever. I am also a Fuji user, but the G5X II has many advantages for a small size, take everywhere camera Sold it long ago and no regret. Sony's latest color science is very close to Nikon standards. Good tools are pretty useful, cars and cameras both.Seduced by AF???

"Thanks to a pop-up electronic viewfinder and higher-quality lens, Canon's G5 X Mark II is a tempting step up from the already-good G7 X Mark III if you don't (NEED) that camera's specialist vlogging (FEEATURES?).". While the price difference is big, both are expensive cameras that are targeting the same audience. Probably that G7XII was reviewed in 2016 and G5XII in 2019. And then released RX10 IV with better AF. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality. As I said before, comparison must be apples with apples. well, obviously the Canon will have more DOF control until 120mm, and then the difference in bokeh won't be big if compared to TZ100 or TZ200, while offering more reach. If you don't need that, you can likely do well with one of the lesser models. Many reviewers do it for years. Interesting. "Adequate" seemswell..adequate when you're talking about fitting a full-featured mirrorless camera in your pocket. On the last screen of the wrench menu, choose Custom Functions (C.Fn), then go to screen 4 of that menu, press Set, then choose the button to be modified. @MrHollywoodThe Sony is smaller, thats why they only get 24-70mm F1.8-2.8 in a VA. Thats why those two cameras are not in the same category for me. In the future maybe point out a camera isn't great for "fast" or simply "moving children". It might be nearly a decade old, but Nikon has released a firmware update to fix a live view problem its D7100 has when connected to a computer. At least I couldn't figure it out. The naming conventions for smaller sensors are confusing and misleading, so we're going to change the way we talk about them. Its miles better. I'd wait to read a few more reviews but my criticism was less about the RX100 VII than about the VI, which I tried and didn't find to be the best. Had to download. It reminds me of the same rediculous ongoing discussions about "equivalence" in comparing sensorsize and Fstop or DOF. Whats for the King and the common folk almost exemplifies Sony against the competition nowadays. ? Inexperienced amateurs are the primary market for finderless cameras. Anybody can help? Like I said, those cameras are really different. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982022 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. @Iron Eagle: the sensor would not make a significant difference in low-light performance, but the lens clearly would. Its common sense that for $1200 one gets a better AF system than if one only had $500. Between that and the dedicated zoom lever, there was complete direct control over image composition. I probably will be affected less as fast tracking won't be a significant need for me. If you plan to be on the move and shoot any action, the answer is A LOT. The end game is not specs but the images you take. Autofocus and video performance from the G5 X II are pretty good - but are they enough to stand out among strong competition?

Youre probably right. Are you serious? The build quality of the Sony is really bad. How does Laowa's latest full-frame lens perform? For someone who wants a more well-rounded camera, the GRIII would have less to offer and less value. It is utterly useless to try and understand the scoring. My concern from what I read is the sharpening algorithms with canon are not very good. Just trying to get an explanation for that. Im at a loss here. The wrap around presentation of many options on the screen was annoying. And something that suprises me a lot, the RAW files of the Canon are better controlled at higher ISOs than those of the Sony. We had 24 or 36 pictures. But unlike the G5, the pictures are way above those taken with my iPhone. It's not.Yes, if you don't shoot stuff that moves much, the Canon will be fine.

There's nothing ostensibly "good" about weaker AF. Not sure what that means, could anyone pls explain? If anyone has a connection at Canon I think this would be a big improvement and a leapfrog over the Sony RX100 line which I believe does not support it either. The scores are to be seen relatively to the standard/expections at the time of the review, so scores from 2016 and 2019 can not be directly compared. This is BS. Serious work; plus don't adapt easily for any problems there may be with the Sony as you pile on the pressure.This is just an everyday camera at a lower price point than the current Sony and is just never going to be really understood by a top level guy throwing money at the hobby.i have a G5X Mk I so I would hate to know what you think of that looking down from your top tier but it works for me. Handling is perhaps slightly better on Canon, and colors after some tweaking. However for a general carry anywhere walkabout camera for anything but video or action it's a very viable alternative. It happens if you keep the camera in a travel bag thinking it's protected if "closed up". As a side note, the macro performance of the canon lens seems to be better than what a rx100 would provide. I have an A6400 and the new tracking and eye AF modes mean that you no longer have to think about AF-S vs AF-C, focus points, etc. It really is a case of the emperors new cloths.

Not even close. What does Canon have against these screens? A 8.8mm (24 mm equivalent) raw photo is usable without lens correction only cropping out of it a good 30%. In these, the Sony fails miserably and is ridiculously more expensive. Find out what we're doing differently. This week, Chris and Jordan do a side-by-side comparison to help you choose the one that's right for you. Want it cheap then there is the RX100 I but if that was fit for purpose why is there a 8th version of the camera and any single issue with a Canon or Panasonic there is always a particular mark of the Sony cited that can do better or represent value for money at that level but for heaven's sake we can't buy all of them. Thanks for the feedback. I wouldn't consider the VII as even better, I'd say it makes the RX100 become what it needed to be to be the leader.

As I said prior, the AF of the Sony is much better while the Canon relies only on contrast, which limits tracking. Either long reach or better low light performance, something I cannot get otherwise for this size/price/weight ratio. Researchers from the Samsung AI Center have developed a new neural technology to animate static images with impressive realism and resolution. Is there any further explanation about "Picky about USB chargers" this in the "what we don't like" list? If these vanes are like the similar ones on my G7X, the vanes will bend. If Sony or canon can more money out of you or sell you the mirage of superiority they will. Me too, I prefer the fixed EVF, and now it's cheaper :-), Looks like a great option for still photographers looking for a compact camera under $1K. But the IQ is certainly there.

Sounds like a RX100 sounds like a better option. Mountain driving? The idea of better is never seen in practical applications. Most modern cameras will shoot video to one degree or another, but these are the ones wed look at if you plan to shoot some video alongside your photos. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media. Not everyone is tech-crazy like I am and so I always suggest trying the camera out before buying regardless of what reviews claim. Ill still shoot Raw but like to include JPEG also now that the JPEG engines are so much better than they used to be . Bringing up smartphones as some sort of reasoning to drop the advantages of the EVF is redonkulous. I could have worded my question a bit more accurately.With JPEG files fun to play with some of the color settings but would like to keep them as malleable as possible. Those vanes are supposed to protect the lens from dust, and 'save' the lens, should the worse occur.Now if a manufacturer is doing things better, it's a shame Canon is not doing the same. Just a few. There are only TWO models with the 24-200mm Zeiss optics and I'm not upgrading to the VII since the VI never misses focus and I don't need a audio jack.

You stated in both reviews how Canon has a brigther lens and Sony "slow" one, yet the comparison bar clearly gives preference to the Sony. Then this whole philosophy of must have a new one as what was fine a year ago is now unusable is just pure nonsensical marketing puff. Not to mention all the mFT alternatives. Video on the Sony is also superior. So far they're doing exactly that. The evidence is out there to see. If you "don't share my findings with the AF" then you also don't share ANYONES findings. This is very misleading. As I said, I'm shooting D850, D5 etc. As a working professional, I do see what colleagues work with and th RX100 series is a popular toy camera for those who want the best. Is that just because it has more range? Since decent ergonomics are usually one of Canon's strengths, what was "to fidgity and sensitive" about the camera? Hoping to get advice as to what might be the best settings for a JPEGs to get the most out of the files. "but if you're a parent who wants to capture action you might consider other options." That's how Canon make money. Daily Overview's Ben Grant, known for creating prints from satellite imagery, has started creating aerial timelapses, including this one from Dubai.

I wish.https://www.dpreview.com/products/panasonic/slrs/panasonic_dmcgm5https://www.dpreview.com/products/pentax/lenses/pentax_xs_40_2. Recently sold the g5x(1) because of the so-so lens and lack of speed. And the RX100 M7 version adds even better AF! Exactly. Have you ever seen a painting come to life, like the portraits in Harry Potter? The 24-70mm equivalent lens on my RX100 is pretty limited, and picking up 70% more reach without losing the ND filter or the wide aperture is amazing! Even assuming that cinematic look is 1. something to care about (especially for something that you would shoot with a pocket camera) and 2. due to the framerate (at least https://wipster.io/blog/debunking-the-180-degree-shutter-rule disagrees): would 24 vs. 25 or 30 make that much of a difference? BTW, I was bashing the tiny Sony for the price and small sensor not long ago. Having had both ZS100 and G5x m ii, AF always impressed on the panasonic and always dissapoints on the canon. The pop-up electronic viewfinder is a nice touch and the camera also comes with fast burst shooting as well as good-quality 4K video. I just returned this camera. Sonys sensor Dept is independent of their camera Dept. The advantage is the cinematic look. I had the mark III and got a lot of problems.

It refers to something specific. Micron's next-generation 232-layer NAND has started shipping. You're paying for the miniaturization. While the RAWS are equal. False. It's time to take a look at what Panasonic is doing right and wrong with their cameras in 2022. Nikon has announced the Z30, an entry-level Z-mount camera aimed at vloggers and other content creators. And if I'm carrying a monopod, what's the point of a pocketable camera? Again, ISO range and results will be largely the same.

But it really can't compete except by offering a lower price point. My Sony RX100 has vanes that are more recessed. Its very very good gear but what does that tell you when most brands are very good. How many pictures can be taken with the RX100 that can't be taken with the Canon? We would need to have a different protocol for compacts and smartphones where we hold the scene illumination constant (which we already do) and simply shoot the camera in 'auto' mode, or in Aperture priority with a wide open aperture. The Sony ends up being worth the extra money.But I'd love to see something better than my RX100 VI (besides the VII). Look at M50, not the best camera, cheap, but it's n1 in Japan and sells well in other countries. Yes, unfortunately none of my USB chargers at home or in my car can charge this camera. Its funny how top photographers continue to succeed with supposedly inferior gear isnt it. Why do you assume the camera cannot be turned off with the EVF up? After years of confusion, DPReview and a group of leading websites and YouTube channels are changing the way we talk about small sensors. So the little Sony's versatility from an ergonomic standpoint is actually going to be better for some shooters.On the other hand, the Sony's menus and controls can be tough for people who don't adapt easily. I understand your point, and it's a good one.

Makes me want to try it on my Sony RX10! Tamron announces development of 50400mm F4.56.3 Di III VC VXD lens for Sony E-mount, Sigma says its full-frame Foveon X3 sensor should be ready 'sometime this year', Tokina rebrands and raises prices of 13 lenses, discontinues three other lenses, Fujifilm releases minor firmware updates for 5 of its APS-C camera systems, Canon Australia teams up with Macquarie University to supply 400mm F2.8 lenses for Huntsman Telescope, FCC listing confirms the existence of DJI's Avata FPV CineWhoop-style drone, Nikon releases firmware update for its nearly 10-year-old D7100 DSLR, MegaPortraits: Samsung AI Center researchers develop animated neural head avatars, Video: A satellite time-lapse of Dubai's transformation over the past three decades, Kolari Vision goes inside Nikon's Z9 in its latest camera teardown, Exascend launches new CFexpress Type A cards, including world's first 240GB-capacity model, Slideshow: Finalists for the 2022 Comedy Pet Photo Awards, DPReview TV: The good and bad of Panasonic cameras, Incredible AI system DALL-E 2 enters public beta, Canon's EOS R3 gets 195fps 'Custom high-speed continuous' mode, 240p FHD video and more, Film-ish Friday: The Sustainable Darkrooms re-source showcases more eco-friendly analog photo processes, DaVinci Resolve 18 includes cloud collaboration, more editing tools & better performance, Godox's Lux Senior is a larger, more powerful flash with a retro-inspired design, Researchers have located oldest galaxy ever observed in Webb's First Deep Field, Five landscape photography lessons I wish I had known five years ago, Haukland's '7in1' jacket is a $299 jacket made specifically for photographers, 8fps burst shooting with autofocus, 30fps Raw burst mode, 4K/30p, 1080/60p video recording with IS (no 24p options), 1080/120p slow motion video with no audio or autofocus, USB 3.1 (with USB-C connector) for data transfer and charging, 230-shot battery life (180 using the EVF) per CIPA standard.

I know how good the VI is, but it is a nice weather camera, but useless in low light. Holding the camera against your head = pretty solid. DPReview TV: Canon G5 X Mark II vs. G7 X Mark III. Not simple, but doable. The most interesting picture in the review ist the comparison of the lenses and aperture.

"The best thing about the Canon is the faster lens, but you give up 80mm of reach.

I'm a Nikon guy for the most part. In how many situations a picture can be taken by RX100 VI but not by another product? I realized that I have to carry a small bag anyway. In terms of performance, the rx100 series are the reference cameras in the compact camera segment since 2012, despite their high price and other companies' attempts at challenging that. For any kind of serious work, ALL of these cameras are toys. again MrHollywood, the VI can't keep up as well as TZ200 with people moving on a stage with lighting.

With its newly improved Super Resolution Zoom, the Pixel 4 makes a case for itself as a replacement for a compact camera with a 4-6x zoom range. I've handled this camera (and my RX100 II) MUCH more than the Canon and never had a problem. What is 'a good hiding'. I agree on the AF statements but for still it's not an issue in my opinion.

Panasonic LX100 II has better image quality, it looks like.

On the plus side, the camera was well built except for the plastic lens ring.

Pls act upon it. It's basically an A6400 + 18-135mm lens (my favorite travel combo) in a pocketable form factor with terrible low light performance and depth of field. And contrary to what a few people claim, I'm NOT a Sony fan. Just because they have the same size sensor and vaguely similar size, does not a peer make. it seems the Canon is softer (I'm guessing the lens is at fault) but gives a cleaner image than all the 1" sensored cameras to date. ".the G5 X Mark II cannot compete with the best of its peers when it comes to autofocus and video.". And the Canon UI is head and shoulders ahead of Sony's offerings (such a small body cries out for touch selection of exposure controls). The Sony also has zero AF issues at the long end. So thats why you ended up with the RX100 VII and other buy the Canon. Because at the image level, you'll be just fine with a smartphone. Both ISO3200 are shot at f/4.0, but the Canon at 1/2500, the Panasonic at 1/1250. @MrHollywood Hmm, for me Canon is a totally different camera than the Sony. Ok, I'm just going by the Scoring section in the conclusion and adding the ZS100 as a comparison. I have had several 1" cameras including the G7X I and II, the LX10 and the RX100 III and VI. One of the primary advantages of the mirrorless designs over DSLRs is the EVF, which allows you to see your exposure, composition and settings even in bright light.

I'm not convinced that the Canon is a good value for its cost. This second-generation lens is smaller than its predecessor and uses a stepping motor, compared to the linear ultrasonic motors used in Samyang's first-generation 85mm F1.4 AF lens. Let good cop Jordan and bad cop Chris walk you through their thoughts. But it is an educated comment, like you I own a stunning array of different cameras and different formats. G5X 749 EUR (original price, now much lower)G5X Mark II 929 EUR, Totally agreeFor 600 usd you now can get a xt20 with the small 15-45This one inch sensor camera is far too expensive. A data recovery expert in Poland, Enter Serwis, has shown off how they use a Spider Board to recover data from a non-functioning memory card. Look at the G7x II, it has worse AF and IQ than the RX100 V but it sold well and is appreciated from vloggers.

Sitemap 4